你認為獨居怎麼樣英語作文
1. 我最喜歡的動物---長頸鹿(英語作文)50--60詞
長頸鹿是我最喜愛的動物。這種動物擁有長長的脖子和腿,它們是世界上最高的動物。長頸鹿的高大體型使它們能夠輕松地吃到高處的樹葉。因此,長頸鹿是受到保護的動物,法律禁止人們傷害它們。
長頸鹿的脖子和腿長是為了適應它們的生活環境。在非洲的草原上,高高的樹木是它們的主要食物來源。長頸鹿的長脖子使它們能夠輕松地夠到高處的樹葉,而長腿則幫助它們在廣闊的草原上快速移動。長頸鹿不僅是食物鏈中重要的一環,還是非洲生態系統中的關鍵物種。
長頸鹿是草食性動物,主要以樹葉、嫩枝和果實為食。它們每天需要花費大量時間進食,以滿足身體對能量的需求。長頸鹿的舌頭也非常長,能夠幫助它們抓住樹葉。長頸鹿的舌頭長達45厘米,這使得它們能夠輕易地夠到高處的樹葉,而其他動物則無法做到。
長頸鹿是獨居動物,通常獨自生活或與配偶及幼崽組成小群體。成年雄性長頸鹿之間有時會發生爭斗,以爭奪配偶或領地。長頸鹿具有獨特的社交行為,它們會用頭碰頭的方式互相打招呼,以表示友好或請求讓路。
長頸鹿是非常珍貴的動物,但由於人類的活動,它們的數量正在逐漸減少。為了保護這一獨特物種,許多國家和地區採取了各種措施,包括設立保護區、禁止獵殺和加強公眾教育等。只有當我們意識到保護長頸鹿的重要性,並採取實際行動,才能確保這一美麗而獨特的物種得以延續。
2. 獨居的好處與壞處
獨居的好處:
1、經濟實惠,可以按照自己的想法過日子,省去了很多開銷。
2、有自己獨立空間和自由。
3、可以省去很多閑聊的時間,用作學習提升能力。
4、減少不必要的生活麻煩。
5、養成獨立的性格和習慣,不依賴別人。
獨居的壞處:
1、遇到困難不能及時求助。
2、有的時候安全感和安全系數不是很高。
3、外面有點動靜就容易害怕。
4、長期獨居,有社交恐懼。
5、心情不好的時候沒有一個可以訴說的人。
獨居單身女性注意事項
1、選擇安全小區入住,周圍環境是否安全,小區的監控設施是否完善,保安是否到位。這樣已經降低了自己碰到流氓歹徒的幾率。
2、小心尾隨者,發現尾隨,拿出電話,佯裝親人來接,乘車時不要低頭玩手機,發現行車路線不對或其他危急狀況,要及時報警。
3、和鄰居搞好關系,萬一發生什麼,鄰里之間也好有個照應,等於多了一個幫手。
4、隨身帶個防狼器,網上各種防狼器很多,根據自己使用習慣選擇購買,以防萬一。
3. 雅思寫作task2參考
雅思寫作task2參考範文
在一些國家,現在越來越多的人選擇獨居。你認為這個現象是好的.還是壞的?面是我整理的雅思英語作文,大家可以參考參考。
雅思作文範文【1】
題目: In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
範文:
In recent years it has become far more normal for people to live alone, particularly in large cities in the developed world. In my opinion, this trend could have both positive and negative consequences in equal measure.
The rise in one-person households can be seen as positive for both personal and broader economic reasons. On an indivial level, people who choose to live alone may become more independent and self-reliant than those who live with family members. A young alt who lives alone, for example, will need to learn to cook, clean, pay bills and manage his or her budget, all of which are valuable life skills; an increase in the number of such indivials can certainly be seen as a positive development. From an economic perspective, the trend towards living alone will result in greater demand for housing. This is likely to benefit the construction instry, estate agents and a whole host of other companies that rely on homeowners to buy their procts or services.
However, the personal and economic arguments given above can be considered from the opposite angle. Firstly, rather than the positive feeling of increased independence, people who live alone may experience feelings of loneliness, isolation and worry. They miss out on the emotional support and daily conversation that family or flatmates can provide, and they must bear the weight of all household bills and responsibilities; in this sense, perhaps the trend towards living alone is a negative one. Secondly, from the financial point of view, a rise in demand for housing is likely to push up property prices and rents. While this may benefit some businesses, the general population, including those who live alone, will be faced with rising living costs.
In conclusion, the increase in one-person households will have both beneficial and detrimental effects on indivials and on the economy.
雅思作文範文【2】
題目: Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
範文:
People have different views about how much choice students should have with regard to what they can study at university. While some argue that it would be better for students to be forced into certain key subject areas, I believe that everyone should be able to study the course of their choice.
There are various reasons why people believe that universities should only offer subjects that will be useful in the future. They may assert that university courses like medicine, engineering and information technology are more likely to be beneficial than certain art degrees. From a personal perspective, it can be argued that these courses provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries, and therefore an improved quality of life for students who take them. On the societal level, by forcing people to choose particular university subjects, governments can ensure that any knowledge and skill gaps in the economy are covered. Finally, a focus on technology in higher ecation could lead to new inventions, economic growth, and greater future prosperity.
In spite of these arguments, I believe that university students should be free to choose their preferred areas of study. In my opinion, society will benefit more if our students are passionate about what they are learning. Besides, nobody can really predict which areas of knowledge will be most useful to society in the future, and it may be that employers begin to value creative thinking skills above practical or technical skills. If this were the case, perhaps we would need more students of art, history and philosophy than of science or technology.
In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for universities to focus only on the most useful subjects, I personally prefer the current system in which people have the right to study whatever they like.
;