穷人怎么培养孩子的英语作文

㈠ 求一篇英语作文,关于穷人家的孩子早当家这一观点,说出自己的想法.

Some feel that the children of low income families are better equipped to deal with difficultiesposed by the "real world" when they grow up and they also believe the privileged children ofwealthy families are less fit to deal with these difficulties. The implications and veracity of thisargument seem self-evident, but in fact require closer examination.
The popular wisdom is that children of poorer families learn early on the value of a buck,and are thus naturally better suited to stretching moneywhen times get tough in althood.Inversely, the children of wealthy families, thoseborn with a silver spoon in their mouths, arebelieved to be completely ignorant of the value of money, having had everything provided forthem in their youth and oftentimes erroneously expecting the same situation in althood. Theyare believed to be prone to overspending and financial irresponsibility. This belief, thoughlogical, overlooks one key point which is, of course, ecation.
The basis of this argument is, of course, knowing the value of money, and the idea thatchildren of the poor know this, and those of the wealthy do not. Who though, is in a betterposition to teach their children the value of money; someone skilled in earning and keeping it,the wealthy parent, or someone who can not seem to acquire it, the poor parent? Bothwealthy and poor children are equally likely to acquire an ecation in money, whether it isformal, or in the school of hard knocks. Conversely, both children are as likely to ignore thisecation.
A poor child may believe that one can get along, if not as easily, without wealth. A wealthychild may be well trained by a parent steeped in the knowledge of money management; the keyto developing this skill is ecation.

㈡ 英语写作，写一篇关于要如何去帮助贫困地区的孩子为题目的英语作文

作文如下：

How to help the children in poor areas As we know ,though the world is growing more and more fast,there are still a lot of children in poor areas. They cannot even pay for their ecation.

如何帮助贫困地区的儿童正如我们所知，尽管世界发展越来越快，但贫困地区仍然有很多儿童。他们甚至无法支付教育费用。

Shoulden't we do something to help them?In my opinion,first we could save a little pin money and donate them to the poor children.Second, we couldgive away some of our old clothes.If you have free time,you'd better bring a few books or toys to see them .

我们不应该做点什么来帮助他们吗？在我看来，首先我们可以存一点零花钱，捐给贫困的孩子们。其次，我们可以把一些旧衣服送人。如果你有空，你最好带几本书或玩具去看。

I believe the poor children need ont only money,but also kindess.All in all,we have a responsibility to help poor chidren.your small kindness may be their world.

我相信贫穷的孩子不仅需要钱，还需要仁慈。总之，我们有责任帮助贫穷的孩子。你的小小的仁慈可能就是他们的世界。

㈢ How can the poor person have a life full of riches 120字英语作文

谢谢，请采纳！！
How Can the Poor Person Have a Life Full of Riches
As we all know,money can’t buy every- thing .So ,even we are poor,we can still lead a life with full of riches.
Of course,this “riches” does not mean the real rich ,but it means the life with full of happiness , enjoyment and so on.
First, we should keep an optimistic heart .Then we can get a lot of fun from the ordinary things ,like stay with families ,or just a good night from the one who you loved. Second, don’t compare with the rich gays. Don’t pursuit too much of the material enjoyment. The rich life not from the material enjoyment, but from the bottom of your heart , it depends on your attitude to life. Finally, never sell your souls for money, otherwise ,you will be upset all your life .
I hope everyone will lead a life with full of Riches .
中文对译：
如何能有一个可怜的人 生活充满财富
众所周知，金钱不能买到所有的东西。所以，即使我们是穷人，我们仍然可以充满财富生活。
当然，这种“财富”并不意味着真正的有钱人，但它是充满幸福的生活，享受等。
首先，我们应该保持一种乐观的心。那么我们可以从普通的事情有很多乐趣，喜欢待在家，或只是一个美好的夜晚从你所爱的人。第二，不要比较丰富的同性恋。不要追求太多的物质享受。不是从物质享受富裕的生活，但从你的内心深处，这取决于你对生活的态度。最后，不要出卖你的灵魂，金钱，否则，你会很不高兴的你的生活。
我希望每个人都充满财富生活。

㈣ 关于贫穷的英文文章。。。。

Global poverty needs a global answer

HBS professor emeritus George C. Lodge's idea of a World Development Corporation has been percolating for years—he wrote a seminal article on the proposal in Foreign Affairs in 2002 (reprinted on HBS Working Knowledge).

The WDC would be a for-profit organization that would create sustainable improvements in impoverished countries. Lodge advanced the ideas in a January 2006 two-part piece in YaleGlobal coauthored with economist Craig Wilson. The authors also have a book e in May, A Corporate Solution to Global Poverty: How Multinationals Can Help the Poor and Invigorate Their Own Legitimacy, to be published by Princeton University Press.

In this recent interview concted by e-mail, Lodge is hopeful that the World Development Corporation will be formed. He explains why nonprofits aren't the answer to ending poverty and asks that executives look beyond philanthropy to make lasting positive change.

Cynthia Churchwell: In your Foreign Affairs article, you shared ideas on first steps to forming a World Development Corporation. What obstacles do you think have prevented this organization from coming into existence? What hope do you have that it will be created in the foreseeable future?

George C. Lodge: Bureaucratic inertia is strong. Big organizations do not like change. There is considerable mutual suspicion among MNCs, NGOs, and multilateral organizations. They are all busy doing what they are doing.

There are ideological problems as I mentioned: Business and government are supposed to be kept separate and preferably distant. And many agree with Milton Friedman who famously said that the purpose of business is to maximize returns to shareholders and compete to satisfy consumer desires in the marketplace. Government—not business—is supposed to define and insure the fulfillment of community needs. (Of course, Friedman's formulation leaves the manager with two problems: the sum of consumer desires does not necessarily equal community need, and many—perhaps most—governments to not define or fulfill community needs in a fashion that is acceptable to many. Thus business is left with no choice but to do so.)

Nevertheless, there is slow and I believe inexorable movement in the direction of a WDC, because it makes sense for all concerned. It will take time but it will happen. Just the other day the CEO of a major MNC decided to take time to get it started.

Q: Your YaleGlobal piece mentions Growing Sustainable Business and the Investment Climate Facility for Africa as positive collaborations between business, government, and nongovernmental organizations. Are there other examples that provide hope of continued partnerships such as these for recing global poverty?

A: Yes, there are many. Here are two: DaimlerChrysler some years ago, under pressure from the Green Party in Germany, decided it had to increase the amount of renewable resources it used in the manufacture of its cars. The manager of the company's Brazilian subsidiary decided to make use of locally grown coca fibers for the manufacture of head rests and seats. With the help of Brazilian NGOs and the U.S. government's Inter-American Foundation, he found a community organization called POEMA in the impoverished northern part of the country near Belem where coca grows abundantly. With public sector financial help a joint venture was set up with POEMA, a modern high-tech factory built, and coca plantations developed. Some 5,000 people were employed. Literacy levels soared. Political participation increased. Change had been introced.

The U.S. Agency for International Development has funded initiatives by Land O' Lakes in some twenty-three poor countries. In Albania, for example, Land O' Lakes has organized 8,000 women into cooperatives for the proction of dairy procts, providing technical support, veterinary services, and the like. While requiring public sector funding at first, these operations eventually become profitable.

The WDC would be a center of research and learning about the impact of business on poverty rection.Q: In what ways could the World Development Corporation be better than other partnerships to improve quality of life and investment climates?

A: First, it would provide for a collective approach to poverty rection. The WDC board of directors would include about twelve of the world's most admired MNCs. In addition, associated companies could be called on to participate in particular projects as necessary. For example, let us imagine a Nestlé dairy operation in a rural area. It might be augmented and complimented by companies engaged in electric generation, telecommunications, housing, and water purification. Poverty, as we have noted, is systemic. Its alleviation requires a systemic approach by companies that are profit oriented. They must be profitable to be sustainable.

Second, the WDC would take the initiative to target projects in countries that have a good chance of success, where the government is hospitable, the local business community eager for partners, and where public funds or low-cost financing can be obtained for the project's early stages. It would organize the interface with supporting institutions such as the World Bank and the UNDP, and with local business partners. And since the WDC would have NGO representation on its board, it would assure NGO cooperation.

Third, the WDC would be a center of research and learning about the impact of business on poverty rection, something about which we know surprisingly little today.

Q: How much progress do you think has been made towards recing global poverty? Are there other key components to poverty rection in addition to multinational corporations?

A: Many Asian countries have made spectacular advances. These include post-WWII Japan and more recently Singapore, China, India, South Korea, and Taiwan. Nevertheless most Africans were better off forty years ago than they are today. Average per capita incomes in the Moslem world from Morocco to Bangladesh and beyond to Indonesia and the Philippines are one half the global average. Poverty in Central Asia is increasing as it is in many countries of Latin America, even those that are relatively prosperous like Mexico and Brazil.

The key to poverty rection, as the Asian examples show, is business, especially small- and medium-sized domestic companies. They provide the jobs, the income, and the motivation for indivials to become ecated and move up in the world. For local business to flourish, however, it often needs access to world markets, technology, credit, and managerial know-how. This is the reality of globalization. And MNCs provide that access.

It is also important that governments provide a hospitable climate within which business can invest and grow. Infrastructure also is important—ports, roads, electric power, etc.

Q: If you could speak directly to executives of multinational enterprises who want to help rece poverty, what would be some practical first steps you would suggest they take?

A: Many big companies are now spending substantial amounts of time and money on being "socially responsible." I would ask them to think more imaginatively than they have about how this time and money could be more effectively spent. Philanthropy is not the answer. A way must be found to align the profit-making capabilities of MNCs more effectively to poverty rection, especially in those countries that now have little if any MNC investment.

No company can act successfully alone. The risks are too high. I would ask them first to call a meeting of CEOs of major MNCs concerned with global poverty and explore the idea of establishing the World Development Corporation, proceeding experimentally and in collaboration with carefully selected NGOs and representatives from the UN and the World Bank. Trying a few projects and seeing how they worked would risk little.

Q: You have had a long-time interest in studying developing countries and the international economy. What has helped maintain your interest over the years?

A: Since I first came to Harvard Business School in 1963 I have been trying to find ways to teach about the political, social, economic, and cultural environment of business, the context that shapes corporate purpose, provides corporate legitimacy, and in many ways controls business activities. In short, I have been trying to learn and teach about how the world works. In this I have enjoyed collaborating with many colleagues in the HBS unit called Business, Government, and the International Economy (BGIE).

My special interest in developing—or poor—countries goes back fifty years to the days when I was in government in charge of international labor affairs in the U.S. Department of Labor ring the administrations of Eisenhower and Kennedy. It was a time when many countries in Africa and Asia were emerging from colonialism. Often trade union leaders were in the forefront of these independence movements, and I traveled the world talking to them. My first book, Spearheads of Democracy, described their activities.

The key to poverty rection, as the Asian examples show, is business.Soon after I came to Harvard I was put in charge of helping to start a school of management in Central America, Instituto Centroamericano de Administración de Empresas. (Today INCAE is judged to be the best business school in Latin America and among the best in the world.) As part of my work there I concted a three-year research project in Veraguas Province, Panama. My students and I had the great good fortune to observe and assist the bishop of the province, Marcos McGrath, establish a cooperative movement that helped some 3000 impoverished peasants. A book, Engines of Change, resulted from this and subsequent research in several other poor regions of Latin America. In the course of this work I discovered that the most efficient—and sustainable—engines of change were in fact corporations. In the province next to Veraguas, for example, the Nestlé company's dairy operation had a very similar effect to that of the bishop's movement. The big difference was that it made a profit. There isn't enough charity money in the world—or tax revenue—to rece global poverty substantially. It can only be done by profitable business.

In 1997 the World Bank sent me to Kazakhstan to help the minister of planning think about the country's growth. At the same time I had an opportunity to study the Bank's programs in other poor countries. It was clear that what the Bank and other development agencies were doing was not recing poverty. In some instances it was actually making it worse by sustaining the political and social arrangements that caused poverty, while increasing the country's debts.

My interest in these matters was further strengthened by a fascination with ideology—that is, the framework of beliefs and ideas that a community uses to define and implement values, having to do, for example, with rights and ties of membership in the community, the role of government, and the definition and fulfillment of community needs. Business derives its legitimacy from ideology—the ideas of property rights and marketplace competition, for example. In the 1980s, Professor Ezra Vogel of Harvard and I compared the ideologies of nine countries, noting how the sources of management authority differed. I have written a number of books about the gap between ideology and practice and the legitimacy problems that spring from that gap. So when I retired from active teaching it seemed like a good idea to write a book combining these two interests, drawing attention to the eroding legitimacy of great publicly-held corporations while at the same time noting their critical importance as engines of change to help the poor in the developing world. Fortunately, Craig Wilson of Australia was willing to join me. He has worked many years in developing countries, most recently as manager of private sector development in East Asia for the International Finance Corporation. Our book, A Corporate Solution to Global Poverty: How Multinationals Can Help the Poor and Invigorate Their Own Legitimacy, will be published soon by Princeton University Press.

Q: In your research, how do you define a "developing country"?

A: Good question. Of course, all countries are "developing" in one way or another. What I mean by the phrase is that countries or regions of countries in which poverty—described by the World Bank as living on less than $1 a day—is endemic, that is rooted in the political, social and economic system as is the case in many countries of Africa, Asia, and Latin America—even parts of relatively advanced countries like Mexico and Brazil. Some countries—for example, China, South Korea, Taiwan, post-war Japan, and Singapore—have dramatically reced poverty; and, it is worth noting, they have done so by encouraging the growth of domestic business and multinational corporate investment.

In many ways the use of the word "development" is misleading because it implies a process that is noncontroversial: Who after all can be against "development"? In fact, as we discovered in Veraguas, the word means profound reform and change—permanent, irreversible, radical change, threatening if not subverting the status quo, rarely supported by governments who represent the status quo.

It is thus highly controversial, raising difficult questions: Who is changing whom? In whose interest? At what speed? And do those being changed want to be changed? It's often dangerous—one of Bishop McGrath's priests was killed by those who opposed the changes he was introcing. So an engine of change needs to provide protection as well as economic and political power, access to world markets, technology, credit, and more. Thus we can see why MNCs can be such effective change engines. We can also see why channeling money into governments that lack either the desire or the ability to introce change does not proce anything that can be properly called development.

Q: What has been your most surprising observation ring your work?

A: In the course of writing A Corporate Solution to Global Poverty, Craig Wilson and I sought to describe what you might call the international development architecture—all the organizations aimed at recing global poverty. To our surprise we discovered a huge gap in that architecture.

The organizations we examined included governmental and intergovernmental organizations—foreign aid agencies, development banks, the United Nations and its specialized agencies, regional organizations like the OECD and more; nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), some 6,000 entities that seek to help the poor; multinational corporations that in the course of their regular, profit-making business activity rece poverty, and associations of MNCs such as the World Business Council on Sustainable Development that encourage poverty-recing activities.

What surprised us was how weak the linkages were between MNCs and NGOs on the one hand and governmental and intergovernmental organizations on the other. MNCs demonstrably rece poverty by providing jobs and nourishing local business. NGOs want to rece poverty but often are reluctant to cooperate with MNCs in doing so, preferring to attack business for its failings. Public sector organizations like the UN and World Bank are leery of business for ideological reasons: They feel that business and government should be separate and distant from one another, and are concerned that business somehow contaminates public sector organizations.

This linkage failure, we found, greatly retards effective poverty rection. Public sector funds could be combined with MNC profit-making activities to greatly enhance the effectiveness of both in recing poverty. Such combination, however, raises obvious legitimacy problems. Thus NGO involvement is essential to monitor and provide assurance that the poor are benefiting from the public-private partnership. NGOs, in spite of their own legitimacy problems, have become the conscience of the world, and they will remain so until the world finds some way to form a government.

We observed that MNCs, NGOs and intergovernmental organizations, such as the United Nations Development Program and the World Bank, have taken small steps in the direction of collaboration and partnership, but they are very small indeed. Thus we propose a new institution to facilitate the cooperation. We call it the World Development Corporation.

㈤ 英语作文 《How to become a good learner》

你是不是对英语作文感到特别苦手，看到英语单词就头疼，总是无从下笔呢？哈哈哈哈，其实英语作文这只拦路虎并没有你想象的那么困难。只要你会说话就会写作，所以没必要对它感到畏惧。
下面我将为你提供三篇关于《How to become a good learner》的英语作文，希望能打开你的思路，让你不再词穷！

作文三
'secation.Inordertounderstanditsmeaning,:First,.Forexample,,...'twanttogothere.However,,inotherwords,whentheystudy,.

翻译
学习如何学习是当今教育界的热门话题。为了理解其含义，有必要理解以下两点：
第一，有不同类型的学习者。例如，一些人通过听别人学习单词，而另一些人则通过看书面形式更好地学习单词。并非所有学生都能有效地再次学习。许多学生对学习不感兴趣。每个教室里总有一些学生不想去那里。然而，如果学生想了解学习过程，换句话说，当他们学习时，他们有更好的机会更快地获得新信息，减少挫折感。

㈥ 如何帮助穷人英语作文

帮助穷人的英语作文70字
Most people who are homeless have menatl health problems or al diagnosis alcohol and mental health problems.Neither of these can be their own fault.If you have ever tried to sleep through a night on a park bench you would wonder how anybody did it in the depths of winter.The Medical Model has nothing to give to people with any mental health problems except containment - knock out drugs very similar in effect to alcohol.Socieyt has no cure for its most vulnerable people.Psychiatric institutions will not work with anybody who has an alcohol problem and the alcohol agencies have no way to help unless the person has enough will to help themselves - so they are pushed away from services to spend their lives begging for enough alcohol to mit slow suicide.It happens in front of our noses and disgust makes the barrier.We cannot help them so we hate them.Many young people are on the street because their housing got closed down and they get into a downward spiral of not being able to get a job without an address and not being able to get the money for a deposit for an address.Many young people run away from abuse at home and get sucked into prostitution.We as a society fail so many people with our instant disgust without hearing the story and without understanding that we are failing them.Alcoholi *** and abuse is everyones issue not just the victims - it disgraces us all.可以吗?
你对穷人最好的帮助途径英语作文
In my opinion,the government is there to help its people when they are in trouble.

There are lots of people in a society who may be grouped as the rich and the poor. As far as a human being is concerned, he should go to work just to make a living. But very often we see in the streets many beggars who label themselves as poor people, people who are in need of money .they beg whoever passes them for money. To the best of my knowledge,they are not really or truly poor people. Most of them are just too lazy to work. To those "poor" people,the government shouldn't and don't donate any money at all. But when a disaster happens,some people suudenly bee poor without any money. In this respect,it is the ty of the government to provide as much money as possible to restore those people to a normal life.When it es to a people's government,money donation to the poor is a must.
英语作文, *** 帮助穷人
Most people who are homeless have menatl health problems or al diagnosis alcohol and mental health problems.Neither of these can be their own fault.If you have ever tried to sleep through a night on a park bench you would wonder how anybody did it in the depths of winter.The Medical Model has nothing to give to people with any mental health problems except containment - knock out drugs very similar in effect to alcohol.Socieyt has no cure for its most vulnerable people.Psychiatric institutions will not work with anybody who has an alcohol problem and the alcohol agencies have no way to help unless the person has enough will to help themselves - so they are pushed away from services to spend their lives begging for enough alcohol to mit slow suicide.It happens in front of our noses and ......

关于帮助穷人a plan of help的英语作文
a plan of help

Helping other is a meaningful action and beneficial to all.Help the other just like lifting a finger.You can help the other in addition to have a good reputation.The Bible said “It is more blessed to give than to receive.” Its shows that when you are helping the other,you are helping yourself as the same time.Helping others can satisfy the spirit and clean your soul.Although helping people don’t expect returns,the other will help you when you need a help because of your helpful.So,helping others can make you have a better social life.
富人通过把钱放在石头下面来帮助穷人的英语作文A rich man helps the poor i
新学期计划

在这新学期来临之际，新年的钟声渐渐消逝，我们也从过节的快乐中走出，投入到紧张的学习生活之中，因此制定这个学习

计划。 首先，应该先纠正自己的学习态度。“态度决定一切！”心态是取得成功的一个非常关键的环节，拥有好的心态，就会拥有好的成绩！

在这学期里，要加强自己不擅长的科目，在语文上，除了把课文中的内容、知识掌握好以外，还应多读一些课外书，如名人名著等。还要再想些办法提高自己的阅读、写作能力，不能只想课内不管课外了。“好记性不如烂笔头。”记好每一次的笔记，认真对待每一次的习作练习，只有基础扎实了，才可以累计更多。数学，不能只明白课本上的习题应怎么做就够了，如果要学好它，就必须在课外再花一些时间来钻研和多做一些练习。上课仔细听讲，弄懂每一个问题，作业及时完成，追求质量和速度，回家做好预习、复习工作。早晚多听读外语，多积累一些单词，提高英语各方面的水平。从良好的基础上向着更高的目标出发。

最后，也是最关键的一点，就是要科学安排时间，没有合理的安排，再好的计划也会付之东流。所以，在新学期里，最要学会的就是要合理安排学习、娱乐、休息的时间，要把每一点一滴宝贵的时间都抓紧。

新学期，新打算，也为新的目标努力

㈦ 100字英语作文穷人的孩子早当家

Kids born in poor families can't get as much as those born in wealthy ones. They tend to treasure what they have. Also, they have more goals than wealthy kids do. They need to think about how they can overtake wealthy kids. The only way to achieve the goal is to worker much harder than wealthy kids. Therefore, poor kids have stronger will and determination, which is the key to success. The more they learn, the more mature they will become. By and by, when rich kids are still playing toys, poor kids have mastered many survival skills.

㈧ 英语作文-如何摆脱贫困

首先是精神上的脱贫，如果精神上一无所有，无所追求无所寄托那么不管有再多钱也是贫穷的。如果是物质上的，那么还是要多学点知识，肯动脑，敢创新，行行出状元嘛，擦皮鞋也能擦出百万富翁。The first is spiritual poverty, and if the spirit of nothing, nothing to pursue it regardless of rootless more money is still poor.
If it is material, then still have to learn more knowledge, willing to brains, the courage to innovate, very best thing, shoeshine also given rise to a millionaire.

㈨ 怎样改善贫穷的英语作文

Among the problems we face, I think poverty is the biggest problem. My reasons are as follows. To begin with, there are still many people dying of starvation in many poor countries. They don’ have enough food, for they have no money. It’s no doubt that eating unhealthily will result in illness. What’s more, people in these undeveloped areas usually lack of proper health care. Thus, infectious diseases like AIDS spreads fast. That is terrible. In addition, their clothes are too worn to be called “clothes”, and thus many of them are frozen to death. The little match girl in Andersen's fairy tale is just a case in point. Such a problem is mostly caused by lack of money, in other word, poverty.From over above we can safely draw a conclusion that poverty is the biggest problem in Earth.

㈩ 如何解决贫穷英语作文

Eradication of Poverty
There is a festival in the world called International Day for the Eradication of Poverty. It falls on the seventeenth of October every year. The reason why this festival exists just as it is serious in the reality life. In present days, although more and more people are enjoying a better life, there are still some people in the situation of poverty. It is an emergency that needs people to solve as soon as possible. In my opinion, there are several aspects people should realize. First of all, the rich should help the poor. They can donate some money to them or provide some job opportunities to them. Otherwise, the gas between the wealthy and poor will be bigger. Secondly, the government should publish some policy to help the poor to escape from poverty. Last but not least, the poor people should try their best to fight for themselves. After all, the best people can help you is yourself. If we can eradicate poverty one day, the world will be more beautiful.