怎麼用英語介紹電影五年級
A. 用5句英文介紹一部英文電影
片名(Name) 《外星人ET》
導演(Director) Steven Spielberg
劇情梗概(Main idea) 外星人（ET）誤留在地球上，Elliott把他秘密留在家裡躲避成年人。ET和Elliott成為好朋友，分享痛苦與歡樂，最後幾個孩子准備冒險送ET返回自己的星球。
評價(Comment) 斯皮爾伯格送給孩子和成年人的經典之作；美麗而感人；友誼和愛是人生最重要的。
注意：
1. 影評包括以上表格要點，不要逐條翻譯； 2. 可適當增加細節，以使行文連貫。
3. 參考詞彙：經典之作classic；冒險go on an adventure
ET is Steven Spielberg』s classic for both children and alts. It is about a story that a creature, ET, is mistakenly left behind on the earth and wants to go back to his home. A boy called Elliott, acted by Henry Thomas, hides him in his house to protect ET from the cold world of grown-ups. They become good friends and are so close that they share sorrows and happiness. At last, Elliott and his friends decide to go on an adventure trying to help ET find the way back to his planet.
The film is beautiful and moving. It shows us that friendship and love are the most important things in life.
B. 適合小學五年級看的英語電影
《馴龍高手》How to Train Your Dragon (2010)
解釋：《怪物史瑞克》中有大量的方言和口音，包括蘇格蘭口音、英式口音、美國黑人口音以及其他口音，在這部影片中你可以聽到各式各樣的英語發音。
C. 用英語5句話介紹你喜歡的電影。快快快
good goodgood
D. 用英語介紹一部電影，小短文，不少於5句，幫幫忙
My favorite movie is Love Me Once More,Mom.This is a moving story about a mother and her son.The son was lost one day and the mother was so worried that she looked for him everywhere,but she couldn't find him.She was very sad and almost went mad.In the end,the son found his mother .But they don't know each other. I cried when I saw the movie.All people say it is so moving.The mother is so good and the son is so lovely.I like th e little boy.He makes me strong.I like it very much.It is my favorite.
翻譯：我最喜歡的電影 我最喜歡的電影是媽媽再愛我一次。這是一個關於母親與兒子之間的感人故事。有一天，那個兒子丟了，母親很擔心並且到處去尋找他，但是她怎麼也找不到他了。母親很悲傷幾乎要發瘋了。在最後，兒子找到了他的母親，但是他們彼此都不認識了。 每每看這部電影我都會哭。所有的人都說它很感人。那個媽媽如此的好兒子如此的可愛。我喜歡那個小男孩。他使我學會了堅強。我很喜歡這部電影。它是我的最愛。
E. 用英語介紹一部電影（帶翻譯）
《阿甘正傳》影評
在影片中，帶著美國南方口音、智力有障礙的阿甘凝視著充滿野性的珍妮，彷彿和美國小說大師福克納的名著《喧囂與騷動》中的傻子班吉是遠親。但二者顯然有著根本的區別：班吉只是一個家庭衰亡的象徵，是個真正的低能兒；而阿甘這個「傻子」卻幾乎代表了這個時代所缺少的所有美德：誠實守信，做事認真，勇敢無畏，重情輕財，反過來說則是具備這些美德便成了愚蠢，這真是對當今某些社會狀況的一個莫大諷刺。
而阿甘所摯愛的珍妮則是墮落的象徵，她染上了幾乎所有的惡習，如吸毒、性解放等，最後她死於一種病毒——其實影射的是艾滋病毒。而阿甘卻不計一切，始終如一地愛著她，影片在對他構成一種似是而非的責備的同時，更體現了他的純真和善良。
阿甘如同一個戰士，以他貌似簡單，實則更為簡單的頭腦和特殊的才能以及強大的體魄為武器，一次又一次地贏得了生存和發展。這是一種對上帝獎勵善良的希望，同時，它更包含了一種基調：向前，跑。有人說，這樣奔跑會給人帶來希望。事實上，希望確實存在，這部獨特的影片贏得了如此眾多的觀眾，吸引了甚至只喜歡輕松的娛樂片的觀眾，便說明了希望本身和希望的魁力。
阿甘形象的塑造顛覆了正常世界中的英雄形象，與傳統觀念背道而馳，具有強烈的反傳統、反主流性。阿甘的經歷讓許多「聰明人」相形見絀，我想導演就是想通過阿甘形象的塑造來反諷社會，反映社會現狀，比如對人的異化、墮落的揭露等
F. 寫一篇介紹電影的英語作文
寫作思路：從電影主演、敘述事件、結果等幾方面寫作。寫作要點：以主要人物的愛國情懷為要點。
《八佰》是由華誼兄弟電影有限公司、北京七印象文化傳媒有限公司出品的戰爭題材影片。
"Eight hundred" is a war film proced by Huayi Brothers Film Co., Ltd. and Beijing seven impression culture media Co., Ltd.
由管虎執導，黃志忠、歐豪、王千源、姜武、張譯、杜淳、魏晨、李晨、俞灝明等主演。
Directed by Guan Hu, Huang Zhizhong, Ou Hao, Wang Qianyuan, Jiang Wu, Zhang Yi, Du Chun, Wei Chen, Li Chen, Yu Haoming, etc.
主要講述了1937年淞滬會戰末期，中日雙方激戰已持續三個月，上海瀕臨淪陷。
At the end of the battle of Songhu in 1937, the fierce war between China and Japan had lasted for three months, and Shanghai was on the verge of being occupied.
「八百壯士」奉命留守上海閘北，在蘇州河畔的四行倉庫鏖戰四天，直至10月30日才獲令撤往英租界。
The "800 heroes" were ordered to stay in Zhabei, Shanghai, and fought hard for four days at the Sihang warehouse on the Bank of Suzhou River. They were ordered to withdraw to the British concession on October 30.
(6)怎麼用英語介紹電影五年級擴展閱讀
影片評價（Film evaluation）——
該片拓寬了我們認識英雄的維度，他們在捨生取義前，也有過平凡的，甚至苟且的懦弱與掙扎。
The film broadens the dimension of our understanding of heroes. Before they sacrifice their lives for righteousness, they also have ordinary, even inlgent cowardice and struggle.
《八佰》的人物塑造採用了群像刻畫的手法，光是主要人物就有二十來個，但這也造成記不住主要人物情況的發生。
The characterization of "eight hundred" adopts the technique of group portrait. There are more than 20 main characters alone, but this also makes it impossible to remember the main characters.
G. 用英語簡單介紹經典電影
你要的信息可以到名為classicfilmpreview的網站下去尋找，英文版的
H. 用英語介紹一部電影
《加菲貓》
The comic to pet owners and their pets drawn, and bring out the "Very often, the family pet is the master of" information. In addition, Garfield is also often need to solve many human problems, such as weight loss, on the Monday of disgust and fear, a sense of things cold and bored and so on.
還有部大氣點的《辛德勒的名單》
Oskar Schindler is a vain, glorious and greedy German businessman who becomes unlikely humanitarian amid the barbaric Nazi reign when he feels compelled to turn his factory into a refuge for Jews. Based on the true story of Oskar Schindler who managed to save about 1100 Jews from being gassed at the Auschwitz concentration camp. A testament for the good in all of us.
I. 用英語介紹電影
English Name : Audrey Hepburn
Born : March 4, 1929
Died : January 24, 1993, died of colon cancer in Switzerland
Place of birth : Brussels, Belgium.
British family : her father was a wealthy banker and his mother was a Dutch Baroness
Standing : Over seven inches (174 centimeters)
Weight : 110 pounds (50 kg)
Hair color : brown
Hobbies : Ballet
Favorite colors : white
Switzerland's most memorable scenes : Snow
The most unforgettable thing : Oscar Award
J. 怎麼用英語介紹一部電影
…'The Terminal' is the latest Hanks/Spielberg collaboration, and though it's not quite as good as 'Catch Me if You Can' or 'Saving Private Ryan' it still makes for a fun watch. The plot, as everyone already knows, is about Krakoan (sp?) immigrant Victor Narvorski (Tom Hanks) whose home country – the fictional land of Krakoa (think Russia or Czechoslovakia) – is torn apart in war while he is in a plane headed for New York. When he lands JFK airport head Frank Dixon (Stanley Tucci) tells him that since he literally doesn't have a country he must stay in the airport terminal until all the hoopla settles. Dixon thinks that Narvorski will ignore him, escape into New York and 'become someone else's problem'. What Dixon doesn't know is that Victor is an honest man, and he will obey the rules and stay in the terminal until he's allowed to leave.
The character of Victor Narvorski is one of those classic movie characters who has no conceivable flaw (other than a minimal understanding of the world around him – and an accent) and dose everything he can to help everyone else. Similar characters that spring to mind are Peter Sellers' Chauncey Gardner from the 1979 satire 'Being There' and John Goodman's Charlie Meadows from the Coen movie 'Barton Fink'. All of these characters are dim-witted, but great people who put their own lives on hold to help their friends.
Some of these friends include Airport worker Enrique Cruz (Diego Luna), who Victor helps get hitched with a beautiful security guard (Zoë Saldana) and Amelia Warren (Catherine Zeta-Jones) a nice, flighty flight attendant who Narvorski inspires to get out of a troubled relationship with a married man.
The Hanks and Zeta-Jones characters strike up a little romance, but luckily its not too overblown, it's more of a subplot than anything.
It takes sometime but soon Narvorski is accepted into a small group of Airport workers including Cruz, kindly Joe Mulroy (Chi McBride) and janitor Gupta Raja (Kumar Pallana), who at first thinks that Narvorski is a federal agent out to get him. These characters are all well written and even better acted, but I thought they could've been awarded with a little more screen time. After all, the three are very good actors. But I guess Luna is still riding off the success of 'Y U Mama Tambien' and McBride, despite the fact that he's been working for many years, is still trying to find a big role that's right for him (which I doubt he'll get from 'I, Robot').
It's Pallana who has the biggest role here, and man, does he deserve it. Very old, and very foreign, he was brought to surprising cult fame when Wes Anderson gave him the role of 'Pagoda' in the 2001 hit 'The Royal Tenenbaums'. Who doesn't remember the short, quiet, hilarious butler of the Tenenbaum family? His role in this is a great follow-up; he is funny, and surprisingly touching and dramatic in a very tense scene near the end that I wont spoil. In any other movie the role of the Indian janitor would be an easy target, but this character isn't funny because he's Indian, but instead funny because he's clever, a little cynical and wily. He stole every scene he's in from under Tom Hanks, or Zeta-Jones, or whoever. This is a long shot, but I think the man deserves an Oscar nomination.
The acting in this movie is the greatest factor – well, that and the huge Terminal set built only for the movie. Some critics are complaining about an underwritten and underused Catherine Zeta-Jones. Whatever. I call her under-necessary (Note: not UNnecessary, UNDER-necessary). I'm glad that her less-than-interesting character wasn't overused, I'm glad the movie wasn't turned into a straight-out romance.
The films deepest and most interesting character is Tucci's Dixon. On the surface he looks like your usual villain, but that's only to simpleton viewers who don't make any attempt to understand their movie characters. Dixon is not a villain. As it's established in the beginning, Dixon has been working the same job at the airport for seventeen years and wants desperately to climb up the latter. Because of this, he makes sure that he follows every single rule; he's the epitome of every by-the-book bureaucrat that we all love to hate. His motto is that in his work there're three important things, 'The person, the document and the story'. In the best scene of the movie Dixon refuses a Russian man to bring medicine to his dying father in Canada because he doesn't have the right form. This scene represents everything about the character of Dixon.
I was also interested in the relationship between Dixon and Narvorski. Dixon is at first refusing Narvorski because it's the rules, but as the film goes on and Dixon is further perplexed by Narvorski it stops being about rules and starts being about hatred and jealousy for Narvorski's joyful existence. He refuses to let Narvorski go to New York when he should be allowed to. In the film's most fulfilling scene Narvorski escapes and Dixon decides to give up chasing him, and you can see in his eyes that he's realized how ridiculous and stubborn he's been acting. This is Tucci's best performance. An Oscar for him, I say!
It is flawed, of course, in a few things. Narvorski's character is never developed, he stays the same person throughout the entire film, but that's fine, because Hanks keeps your interest and is at his most lovable. Also, the ending stretched on just a little bit…if I had my way it would've ended with Dixon happily watching Narvorski escape in his cab, the rest could've just as easily been implied. I think the ending is a very important part of any film, and this one was – in a way – ruined.
But, no movie is perfect, and I have no problem accepting this as a lighthearted picture with a few interesting characters.