英語社會科學類文章閱讀

『壹』 那裡去找英文原著或文章--主要是人文社科類的名著

王府井圖書大廈地下一樓

『貳』 寫一篇英文不少於100字的關於人文和社會科學能給我們什麼啟示的文章

和諧的社會能給人美的享受和物質的滿足，人們過著溫暖和質感的生活版;人們的價值得到權承認，智慧得到嘉獎，尊嚴得到尊重，痛苦和責任得到理解和分擔;和諧的社會應有一雙大手，扶起跌倒的老人，拭乾受挫者的眼淚，撫慰失落者的心靈，給成功的人以掌聲，為迷茫的人指明方向。和諧的社會更需要鋼筋水泥，架起貫徹長天的虹橋，築就一座座人類文明發展的里程碑，讓高樓拔地而起，讓夢想奔向宇宙。這就需要人文來支撐人們的精神價值體系，用科學奠定實生活的基礎。
回望中國五千年的綿綉歷史，鐵馬冰河攪亂了多少文人武士的清夢，關塞明月寄託了多少成功戰士思家的情懷。尤其是近代以來，帝國主義對中國的侵略，中國如同棄擲於碾盤之中，受盡磨礪。然而中國並沒有被打倒，至今仍雄踞一方。是什麼讓他堅韌如斯，得以長存?是中華民族五千年來的文化積淀，是中華民族的錚錚傲骨，這如一層柔韌的襁褓，呵護著中國度過一個個充斥著凄風苦雨的黑夜。燦爛的文明，是中國捧出的絢麗的珍珠，這珍珠顆顆都是風雨磨礪的結晶。文化支撐著一個古老文明的延續，在延續中文化得充實。正是文化喚醒了人們「天下興亡，匹夫有責」的意識，激發了戰士們同仇故愾，祝死如歸的鬥志。

『叄』 中國最牛逼的一本社科類雜志，是不是《中國社會科學》啊英文的

應該是吧。

『肆』 推薦一下比較好的英語社科類雜志

英語廣場

『伍』 急求英文社科類論文一篇，字數2000字左右，不要太難，六級左右的難度即可，我做翻譯用。

你好，我在校內資料庫外文知網搜的。所以你打不開。就不給地址了，希望對你有用。
Cooperation and the Commons
Sustainably managing common natural resources, such as fisheries, water, and forests, is essential for our long-term survival. Many analysts have assumed, however, that people will maximize short-term self-benefits—for example, by cutting as much firewood as they can sell—and warned that this behavior will inevitably proce a 「tragedy of the commons」 (1), such as a stripped forest that no longer proces wood for anyone. But in laboratory simulations of such social dilemmas, the outcome is not always tragedy. Instead, a basic finding is that humans do not universally maximize short-term self-benefits, and can cooperate to proce shared, long-term benefits (2, 3). Similar findings have come from field studies of commonly managed resources (6–7). It has been challenging, however, to directly relate laboratory findings to resource conditions in the field, and identify the conditions that enhance cooperation. On page 961 of this issue, Rustagi et al. (8) help fill this gap. In an innovative study of Ethiopia's Oromo people, they use economic experiments and forest growth data to show that groups that had a higher proportion of 「conditional cooperators」 were more likely to invest in forest patrols aimed at enforcing firewood collection rules—and had more proctive forests. They also show that other factors, including a group's distance to markets and the quality of its leadership, influenced the success of cooperative management.

Researchers have translated social dilemmas into economic games in which the players—typically college students in the United States or Europe—can earn real money, depending on whether they and others 「invest」 in a common good, or become 「free riders」 who benefit without paying their fair share. Cardenas (9) was the first to translate a game carried out with students using computers in a lab (5) into a pen-and-paper version that was played by actual users of local forests in Colombia. This field effort essentially replicated the lab findings, but the levels of cooperative behavior observed were more variable. Other field experiments examined how people who relied on forests, fisheries, and grazing lands responded to experimental designs that enabled them to impose sanctions on free riders, including varying monetary penalties (10, 11). Several examined whether rules established by an external authority—such as a government—「 out」 a group's motivation to cooperate
In Ethiopia's Bale Mountains, Rustagi et al. took these experiments a step further. There, high livestock density poses a major threat to forests, because the animals browse on young trees. To address this and other problems, officials launched a forest management program that gave Bale Oromo groups common ownership of woodlands, and responsibility for maintaining forest cover. To explore the role of cooperation in the success of these efforts, Rustagi et al. first set up 「field labs」 in a number of villages, and invited residents to play games designed to measure their propensity to cooperate (conditional on others' cooperation). They also concted surveys that gathered socioeconomic data and information about resource monitoring efforts. Finally, they compared the game results and the survey data from 49 groups to measurements of potential crop trees, an indicator of forest proctivity. Overall, they found that the groups with the larger shares of conditionally cooperative members were more likely to be successful in managing their forest commons. They also invested more in 「costly」 enforcement of cooperation (participating in forest patrols, which promote cooperation by sanctioning free riders).

By establishing this link between the levels of cooperation observed in field labs with local forest conditions, Rustagi et al. have increased the confidence that scholars can have in the external validity of results from previous experiments carried out all over the world, with student and nonstudent subjects. In addition, by adding to findings showing diverse levels of cooperation in social dilemmas, rather than no cooperation, they support the growing acceptance of a behavioral theory of human action (14): Indivials facing dilemmas, who learn from experience and adopt a norm of conditional cooperation, achieve levels of cooperation that increase over time—if a sufficient number of conditional cooperators are present. If a group is composed of a substantial number of free riders, however, cooperation levels fall over time.

One way of interpreting Rustagi et al.'s findings is that learning and norm-adopting indivials are attracted to certain situations, and then are affected by the behavior of other actors facing the same situation (see the figure). Initially, this leads to some degree of cooperation (e.g., acceptance of rules of the forest group, monitoring other users, and helping to maintain their forest). If enough indivials initially cooperate, they slowly obtain benefits from the forest, and levels of cooperation grow. Alternatively, initial cooperation rates can be low, and then can continue to decline over time.

Rustagi et al. identify a number of well-known variables that can influence cooperation, including the size of the forest group, its leadership, and the heterogeneity of the group. Other, broader, variables include village elevation and market access, with villages closer to markets for wood procts more likely to invest in cooperative management. Other field studies have found that prior experience in cooperative management increases the likelihood of groups successfully managing a resource.

Rustagi et al. also found that the share of conditional cooperators in a group is affected by clan affiliation and the leader, who needs to have sufficient prestige to change the norms of the group. Other recent evidence from field experiments shows that resource users responded prosocially to environmental appeals made by park rangers (15). More details of cultural effects on cooperation are provided by Prediger et al. (16), who use a socioecological framework (17) to identify main differences between two populations before performing field experiments. They show that historical events that interfere with self-governance, as well as subtle ecological differences, can affect the propensity to cooperate.

More research is needed to explain the factors that proce variation in cooperation. Using multiple methods (18) to identify the relevant 「microsituational」 and broader contextual variables, and using robust econometric methods to link these variables with differences in behavior and real-world outcomes, will constitute a major step in advancing a behavioral theory of human action.

『陸』 人文社科的優勢和劣勢英語作文

Since I was an elementary school student, I have been doing a great deal of reading and writing. I like philosophy, politics, and science as well as fairy tales. I study history carefully, especially the history about our own people and country. It is always enjoyable to sit on the grass in an open sir place reading my books. It is quite natural and clear to me that my major in college will be one of the humanities. I imagine that a career in teaching humanities will be challenging and attractive. One day when I hold conversations with young students in classroom or any place, we will discuss a philosophy of life, ways of thinking, the idea of democracy, ideas of right and wrong, and ideas of beauty.

『柒』 請大家推薦幾個好的國外社科英文書籍及視頻網站，最好能夠免費下載國外英文社會科學書籍和觀看視頻的

去時代周刊就夠了。但是視頻一般是下載不了的

『捌』 想找一些有意思的人文社科類的英文期刊論文，可以在哪裡找

一般比較大型的報紙上會有英文版的內容

『玖』 社科類的英文資料庫有哪些

《城市規劃》有英文版，但英文版的不是核心，你最好問一下。

『拾』 求社科院研究生英語教材—社會科學英語閱讀理解高級教材—裡面文章的中文翻譯

來這，不如去社科苑論壇。
如果你想考社科院的話，那裡信息很多。基本都是免費的。是大家義務提供了。