1999年考研英語閱讀全文翻譯

『壹』 2009考研英語閱讀真題解析和全文翻譯(1994-2012)

《2009考研英語閱讀真題解析和全文翻譯(1994-2012)》網路網盤資源下

鏈接: https://pan..com/s/1pyT-SOqCboLltUPEG0WquQ

提取碼：6666

這里有考研歷年英語真題及講解，如果資源有問題隨時追問

『貳』 05——07年考研英語閱讀及譯文

回答字數在10000字以內，所以就放了2005年希望對你有用。

2005 Passage 1

Everybody loves a fat pay rise. Yet pleasure at your own can vanish if you learn that a colleague has been given a bigger one. Indeed, if he has a reputation for slacking, you might even be outraged. Such behaviour is regarded as 「all too human」, with the underlying assumption that other animals would not be capable of this finely developed sense of grievance. But a study by Sarah Brosnan and Frans de Waal of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has just been published in Nature, suggests that it all too monkey, as well.

The researchers studied the behaviour of female brown capuchin monkeys. They look cute. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food tardily. Above all, like their female human counterparts, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of 「goods and services」 than males.

Such characteristics make them perfect candidates for Dr. Brosnan's and Dr. de waal's; study. The researchers spent two years teaching their monkeys to exchange tokens for food. Normally, the monkeys were happy enough to exchange pieces of rock for slices of cucumber. However, when two monkeys were placed in separate but adjoining chambers, so that each could observe what the other was getting in return for its rock, their behaviour became markedly different.

In the world of capuchins grapes are luxury goods (and much preferable to cucumbers) So when one monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her token, the second was reluctant to hand hers over for a mere piece of cucumber. And if one received a grape without having to provide her token in exchange at all, the other either tossed her own token at the researcher or out of the chamber, or refused to accept the slice of cucumber .Indeed, the mere presence of a grape in the other chamber (without an actual monkey to eat it) was enough to rece resentment in a female capuchin.

The researches suggest that capuchin monkeys, like humans, are guided by social emotions, in the wild, they are a co-operative, groupliving species, Such co-operation is likely to be stable only when each animal feels it is not being cheated. Feelings of righteous indignation, it seems, are not the preserve of people alone, Refusing a lesser reward completely makes these feelings abundantly clear to other members of the group. However, whether such a sense of fairness evolved independently in capuchins and humans, or whether it stems form the common ancestor that the species had 35 million years ago, is, as yet, an unanswered question.

21. In the opening paragraph, the author introces his topic by
[A]. posing a contrast.
[B]. justifying an assumption.
[C]. making a comparison.
[D]. explaining a phenomenon.

22. The statement 「it is all too monkey」 (Last line, paragraph l) implies that
[A]. monkeys are also outraged by slack rivals.
[B]. resenting unfairness is also monkeys' nature.
[C]. monkeys, like humans, tend to be jealous of each other.
[D]. no animals other than monkeys can develop such emotions.

23. Female capuchin monkeys were chosen for the research most probably because they are
[A]. more inclined to weigh what they get.
[B]. attentive to researchers' instructions.
[C]. nice in both appearance and temperament.
[D]. more generous than their male companions

24. Dr. Brosnan and Dr. de Waal have eventually found in their study that the monkeys
[A]. prefer grapes to cucumbers.
[B]. can be taught to exchange things.
[C]. will not be co-operative if feeling cheated.
[D]. are unhappy when separated from others.

25. What can we infer from the last paragraph?
[A]. Monkeys can be trained to develop social emotions.
[B]. Human indignation evolved from an uncertain source.
[C]. Animals usually show their feelings openly as humans do.
[D]. Cooperation among monkeys remains stable only in the wild.

重點詞彙：

assumption  （假定；承擔；呈現）是assume的名詞形式；見1997年Text 2。.參consumption，2002年Text 3。assumption — the mother of screw-up 臆斷——把事情弄糟的根源。underlying assumption 潛在的假定。
grievance /n.委屈冤情不平。申訴人提出不滿意見交付仲裁者。悲痛傷心事不幸憂傷。因為有冤情（）而滿懷悲痛（）向申訴人申訴。

tardily  adv.緩慢。形容詞形式拖拉的。（諧音記憶：他地，工作是他的，所以我可以拖拉）

counterpart （相似或對應的人或物）即counter+part，counter-前綴「對等」，part部分，「對等的部分」。見2000年 Passage 4 。
token  n. 表示, 向征, 記號, 代幣 adj. 象徵的, 表意的。Tears are queer tokens of happiness. 眼淚是快樂的一種奇怪的表示。
reluctant  （不願的，勉強的）即re+luct+ant，re-看作「反復」，luct可看作詞根lect「選擇」，-ant形容詞後綴，人們都不願反反復復地作選擇，所以「反復選擇」→不願的。Suggestion systems can work — don't be reluctant to use them.建議制度是有效的——不要不願使用它們。
indignation  n. 憤慨, 義憤。 記憶：in-dig挖（坑）-nation，挖坑藏在裡面的民族，能不憤慨嗎？比如老薩，呵呵。形容詞形式 indignant  adj. 憤怒的, 憤慨的

難句分析：
①Such behaviour is regarded as 「all too human」, with the underlying assumption that other animals would not be capable of this finely developed sense of grievance.
前一分句是句子的主句，其中使用了短語regard…as…的被動形式；with加名詞作狀語，即「帶有潛在的假定」，其中assumption後接有that引導的同位語從句解釋說明假定的內容。
翻譯：這種行為被看作是「人之長情」，他潛在的假定就是其他動物不可能有這種高度發達的不公平意識。
②when two monkeys were placed in separate but adjoining chambers, so that each could observe what the other was getting in return for its rock, their behaviour became markedly different.
該句子的主句是their behaviour became markedly different.前面是when引導的時間狀語從句，其中包含了so that引導的目的狀語從句。
翻譯：當兩個猴子被安置在隔開但相鄰的兩個房間里，能夠互相看見對方用石頭換回來什麼東西時，猴子的行為就會變的明顯不同。

試題解析：
這篇文章是講猴子有一種天然的公平意識，文章本身難度不是太大，一開始做了一個類比，講人的公平意識。然後根據這個類比，文章重點談猴子們的公平意識。這篇對比性的文章兩個方面要理解，第一，人類和猴子之間都有一種近似的表現，當受到不公正待遇的時候，都有義憤填膺的感覺，如果把握這個邏輯，就是類比的邏輯。第二, 最後兩段關於選擇的實驗的對象以及實驗的結果。

21題，我們應該選擇C，考察第一段的寫作手法，明顯用的是猴和人之間的相似形的比較關系。
22題答案是B，也是在把猴子和人做類比，指出猴子與人一樣都抱怨不公平
23題答案選A，這個是事實細節題，答案是根據文章第三段第一句話得到的，雌性的猴子被選擇做研究，是因為她們更加註重她們獲得的東西。
24題答案選擇C，他們最終的發現是什麼，篇章最後兩段反復重復，如果沒有受到公平的話，
25題選擇B.這篇文章第一段和最後一段都出現一個詞，"假設"為什麼猴和人都有這種心理反應，這個問題沒有得以解決。

全文翻譯：
人人都喜歡大幅加薪，但是當你知道一個同事薪水加得比你還要多的時候，那麼加薪帶給你的喜悅感就消失的無影無蹤了。如果他還以懶散出名的話，你甚至會變得怒不可遏。這種行為被看作是「人之長情」，其潛在的假定其他動物不可能具有如此高度發達的不公平意識。但是由喬治亞州亞特蘭大埃里莫大學的Sarah Brosnan 和Frans de Waal進行的一項研究表明，它也是「猴之常情」。這項研究成果剛剛發表在《自然》雜志上。

研究者們對雌性棕色卷尾猴的行為進行了研究。它們看起來很可愛，性格溫順，合作，樂於分享食物。最重要的是，就象女人們一樣，它們往往比雄性更關注「商品和服務」價值。這些特性使它們成為Brosnan 和 de Waal理想的研究對象。研究者們花了兩年的時間教這些猴子用代幣換取食物。正常情況下，猴子很願意用幾塊石頭換幾片黃瓜。但是，當兩個猴子被安置在隔開但相鄰的兩個房間里，能夠互相看見對方用石頭換回來什麼東西時，猴子的行為就會變的明顯不同。

在卷尾猴的世界裡，葡萄是奢侈品（比黃瓜受歡迎得多）。所以當一隻猴子用一個代幣換回一顆葡萄時，第二隻猴子就不願意用自己的代幣換回一片黃瓜。如果一隻猴子根本無需用代幣就能夠得到一顆葡萄的話，那麼另外一隻就會將代幣擲向研究人員或者扔出房間外，或者拒絕接受那片黃瓜。事實上，只要在另一房間里出現了葡萄（不管有沒有猴子吃它），都足以引起雌卷尾猴的怨恨。

研究人員指出，正如人類一樣，卷尾猴也受社會情感的影響。在野外，它們是相互合作的群居動物。只有當每隻猴子感到自己沒有受到欺騙時，這種合作才可能穩定。不公平而引起的憤怒感似乎不是人類的專利。拒絕接受較少的酬勞可以讓這些情緒准確無誤地傳達給其它成員。但是這種公平感是在卷尾猴和人類身上各自獨立演化而成，還是來自三千五百萬前他們共同的祖先，這還是一個懸而未決的問題。

2005 Passage 2

Do you remember all those years when scientists argued that smoking would kill us but the doubters insisted that we didn't know for sure? That the evidence was inconclusive, the science uncertain? That the antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life and the government should stay out of the way? Lots of Americans bought that nonsense, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early graves.
There are upsetting parallels today, as scientists in one wave after another try to awaken us to the growing threat of global warming. The latest was a panel from the National Academy of Sciences, enlisted by the White House, to tell us that the Earth's atmosphere is definitely warming and that the problem is largely man-made. The clear message is that we should get moving to protect ourselves. The president of the National Academy, Bruce Alberts, added this key point in the preface to the panel's report 「Science never has all the answers .But science does provide us with the best available guide to the future, and it is critical that out nation and the world base important policies on the best judgments that science can provide concerning the future consequences of present actions.」
Just as on smoking, voices now come from many quarters insisting that the science about global warming is incomplete, that it's Ok to keep pouring fumes into the air until we know for sure. This is a dangerous game: by the 100 percent of the evidence is in, it may be too late. With the risks obvious and growing, a prudent people would take out an insurance policy now.
Fortunately, the White House is starting to pay attention. But it's obvious that a majority of the president's advisers still don't take global warming seriously. Instead of a plan of action, they continue to press for more research-a classic case of 「paralysis by analysis」.
To serve as responsible stewards of the planet, we must press forward on deeper atmospheric and oceanic research But research alone is inadequate. If the Administration won't take the legislative initiative, Congress should help to begin fashioning conservation measures .A bill by Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, which would offer financial incentives for private instry is a promising start Many see that the country is getting ready to build lots of new power plants to meet our energy needs. If we are ever going to protect the atmosphere, it is crucial that those new plants be environmentally sound.
26. An argument made by supporters of smoking was that
[A]. there was no scientific evidence of the correlation between smoking and death.
[B]. the number of early deaths of smokers in the past decades was insignificant.
[C]. people had the freedom to choose their own way of life.
[D]. antismoking people were usually talking nonsense.
27. According to Bruce Alberts, science can serve as
[A]. a protector.
[B]. a judge.
[C]. a critic.
[D]. a guide.
28. What does the author mean by 「paralysis by analysis」 (Last line, paragraph 4)
[A]. Endless studies kill action.
[B]. Careful investigation reveals truth.
[C]. prudent planning hinders.
[D]. Extensive research helps decision-making.
29. According to the author, what should the Administration do about
[A]. Offer aid to build cleaner power plants.
[B]. Raise public awareness of conservation.
[C]. Press for further scientific research.
[D]. Take some legislative measures.
30. The author associates the issue of global warming with that of smoking because
[A]. they both suffered from the government's negligence.
[B]. a lesson from the latter is applicable to the former.
[C]. the outcome of the latter aggravates the former.
[D]. both of them have turned from bad to worse.

重點詞彙：
prudent adj. 謹慎的。It's prudent to take a thick coat in cold weather when you go out. 在寒冷的天氣下外出時帶上件厚外套是謹慎的。名詞形式prudence n. 審慎。記憶：rude 粗魯的，無禮的，p不-rude粗魯的-ent形容詞後綴
paralysis n. 癱瘓, 麻痹。 para-側面。參見2003年Text 2。
paraphrase  （n.v.釋意）即para+phrase，para-前綴表「在旁邊、輔助」，phrase即「短語；用短語表達」，故「用短語輔助表達」→釋意。以para-為前綴的單詞還有paragraph（文章的段、節；短評）←para+graph寫；parameter（參數）←para+meter計量；parasite（寄生蟲）←para+site地點。
analysis  n. 分析, 分解。記憶：an-a-lysis，後綴同上，分析成一個an,a。聯想：反義詞synthesis n. 綜合, 合成

take the legislative initiative
take the initiative 帶頭,開始著手 took the initiative in trying to solve the problem.開始著手試圖解決這個問題
initiative  n. 主動。 名詞形式initiate vt. 開始, 發動, 傳授 v. 開始, 發起
legislative  adj. 立法的, 立法機關的 n. 立法機關。參見1999 Passage 4 。legislation  （立法；法規）看作leg+is+lat(e)+ion，leg詞根「法律」（參allegation宣稱，2003年Text 2），is是，late遲的，-ion名詞後綴，「法律是遲的」→舊法律難以適應新事物→所以要不斷「立法」→「立法」之產物即「法規」。

難句解析：
①The latest was a panel from the National Academy of Sciences, enlisted by the White House, to tell us that the Earth's atmosphere is definitely warming and that the problem is largely man-made.
主幹部分是The latest was a panel，表語panel後接有兩個定語成分：from的介詞短語和含enlisted的過去分詞，即「白宮召集的、來自國家科學院的專家團」，其中第二個定語成分中又包含一個不定式結構，表目的，即「為了告訴我們……而召集的（專家團）」。
翻譯：最近的行動是由白宮召集了一批來自國家科學院的專家團，他們告訴我們，地球氣候毫無疑問正在變暖，而這個問題主要是人為造成的。
②But science does provide us with the best available guide to the future, and it is critical that out nation and the world base important policies on the best judgments that science can provide concerning the future consequences of present actions.」
該句子的主幹是由and連接的兩個並列從句，前一分句的主幹是science…provide us with…guide；後一分句的主幹是it is critical，其中it為形式主語，真正的主語是that引導的主語從句。從句的主幹是our nation and the world base…policies on…judgments，judgments後接有兩個定語結構，一是that引導的定語從句，一是concerning分詞結構。
翻譯：但是科學確實為我們的未來提供了最好的指導，關鍵是我們的國家和整個的世界在做重要決策時，應該以科學能夠提供的關於人類現在的行為對未來影響最好的判斷作為依據。
③Just as on smoking, voices now come from many quarters insisting that the science about global warming is incomplete, that it's Ok to keep pouring fumes into the air until we know for sure。
該句子的主幹是voices now come from many quarters；句首Just as結構做比較狀語，意為「正如…一樣」；insisting 引導的分詞結構做定語修飾主語voice，分詞結構中含有兩個並列的由that引導的賓語從句，第二個賓語從句的真實主語是不定式結構to keep…
翻譯：就象吸煙問題一樣，來自不同領域的聲音堅持認為有關全球變暖的科學資料還不完整。
試題解析：
第二篇文章是一篇一般的時事性文章，這也是一篇類比，考完了以後很多考生說這篇文章講抽煙，其實不是的，作者講抽煙是想說明現在的溫室效應，也是一種類比，許多人抽煙沒有人去管，因為缺乏足夠的證據,咱們各國政府也不管溫室效應, 也是同樣的原因。中心講的是世界各個政府對溫室效應的解決的態度，篇章的關鍵詞圍繞這樣三個問題展開，第一個就是證據不充足。第二是科學的意義。第三是制定法律，尤其最後三段大量出現立法和法規的現象，
26題選C，
27應該選D，科學應該作為一個指導性，是答案是根據文章第2段的最後兩句話。
28題是猜單詞題，單詞所在的句子的意思是有些人總要科學證據，結果抹殺了行動。所以選A。29答案選擇D，採取某種法律措施，法律在最後的段落重復的最多。
30題作者談的抽煙的教訓對我們溫室處理也是一樣的，選B。
全文翻譯：
還記得科學家們認為吸煙會致人死亡，而那些懷疑者們卻堅持認為我們無法對此得出定論的時候嗎？還記得懷疑者們堅持認為缺乏決定性的證據，科學也不確定的時候嗎？還記得懷疑者們堅持認為反對吸煙的游說是為了毀掉我們的生活方式，而政府應該置身事外的時候嗎？許多美國人相信了這些胡言亂語，在三十多年中，差不多有一千萬煙民早早的進了墳墓。
現在出現了與吸煙類似的令人感到難過的事情。科學家們前仆後繼，試圖使我們意識到全球氣候變暖所帶來的日益嚴重的威脅。最近的行動是由白宮召集了一批來自國家科學院的專家團，他們告訴我們，地球氣候毫無疑問正在變暖，而這個問題主要是人為造成的。明確的信息表明是我們應該立刻著手保護自己。國家科學院院長Bruce Alberts在專家團報告的前言中加上了這一重要觀點：「科學解答不了所有問題。但是科學確實為我們的未來提供了最好的指導，關鍵是我們的國家和整個的世界在做重要決策時，應該以科學能夠提供的關於人類現在的行為對未來影響最好的判斷作為依據。
就象吸煙問題一樣，來自不同領域的聲音堅持認為有關全球變暖的科學資料還不完整。在我們證實這件事之前可以向大氣中不斷的排放氣體。這是一個危險的游戲；到了有百分之百的證據的時候，可能就太晚了。隨著風險越來越明顯，並且不斷增加，一個謹慎的民族現在應該准備一份保單了。
幸運的是，白宮開始關注這件事了。但是顯然大多數總統顧問並沒有認真看待全球氣候變暖這個問題。他們沒有出台行動計劃，相反只是繼續迫切要求進行更多的研究――這是一個經典的「分析導致麻痹案例」。
為了成為地球上有責任心的一員，我們必須積極

『叄』 1999年的考研英語一真題passage1的第一題A選項以以下的為翻譯，A選項不也

考研英語A段區和B段區沒有區別，考試的試題是一樣，只是最終的分數線，專一般A類考生要高於屬B類考生。對於考研英語而言，有區別的是英語一和英語二。
考研英語一和英語二題型的區別主要有：
1、翻譯，英語一的翻譯是從文章中抽出5個長難句進行翻譯，英語二是選擇一個段落進行翻譯。英語一的翻譯10分，英語二的翻譯15分。
2、大作文，英語一要求160-200單詞，20分；而英語而要求150單詞，15分。
其餘的題型和分數是一樣的。
第一部分是英語知識運用，即我們常說的完型填空，總共10分，20題，每題0.5分。
第二部分是閱讀理解，A部分是傳統閱讀理解，共4篇文章，每篇5道題，共40分。B部分是新題型，5道題共10分。（C部分是翻譯，兩者有區別）
第三部分是寫作。第一題是小作文，應用文寫作，要求100字左右，10分。（第二題是大作文，兩者有區別）

『肆』 1999年的考研英語一真題passage1的第一題A選項以以下的為翻譯，A選項不也

我剛做過,這個答案本身就是錯的，通過得到補鎮桐陸償可以減緩輪亂顧客的不幸，而不是通過法律訴訟，訴訟成功與否還尚未御頃確定呢，這是fallacy

『伍』 考研英語閱讀理解和翻譯

考研英語閱讀理解和翻譯

想要把考研英語考好,不在考場上心理崩盤,只有詳細研究真題和精讀外刊,否則絕大部分考生對文章的理解註定是只言片語和模糊不清的,下面是我給大家提供的考研的英語閱讀理解練習真題及翻譯，一起來練習一下吧!

The world is goingthrough the biggest wave of mergers and acquisitions ever witnessed. Theprocess sweeps from hyperactive America to Europe and reaches the emergingcountries with unsurpassed might. Many in these countries are looking at thisprocess and worrying: “Won't the wave of business concentration turn into an uncontrollableanti-competitive force?"

There's no question that the big are getting bigger and morepowerful. Multinational corporations accounted for less than 20% ofinternational trade in 1982. Today the figure is more than 25% and growingrapidly. International affiliates account for a fast-growing segment ofproction in economies that open up and welcome foreign investment. InArgentina, for instance, after the reforms of the early 1990s, multinationalswent from 43% to almost 70% of the instrial proction of the 200 largestfirms. This phenomenon has created serious concerns over the role of smallereconomic firms, of national businessmen and over the ultimate stability of theworld economy。

I believe that the most important forces behind the massive M&Awave are the same that underlie the globalization process: fallingtransportation and communication costs, lower trade and investment barriers andenlarged markets that require enlarged operations capable of meeting customers'demands. All these are beneficial, not detrimental, to consumers. Asproctivity grows, the world's wealth increases。

Examples of benefits or costs of the current concentration wave arescanty. Yet it is hard to imagine that the merger of a few oil firms todaycould re-create the same threats to competition that were feared nearly acentury ago in the U.S., when the Standard Oil trust was broken up. The mergersof telecom companies, such as WorldCom, hardly seem to bring higher prices forconsumers or a rection in the pace of technical progress. On the contrary,the price of communications is coming down fast. In cars, too, concentration isincreasing—witness Daimler and Chrysler, Renault and Nissan—but it doesnot appear that consumers are being hurt。

Yet the fact remains that the merger movement must be watched. Afew weeks ago, Alan Greenspan warned against the megamergers in the bankinginstry. Who is going to supervise, regulate and operate as lender of lastresort with the gigantic banks that are being created? Won't multinationalsshift proction from one place to another when a nation gets too strict aboutinfringements to fair competition? And should one country take upon itself therole of“defending competition" on issues that affect many othernations, as in the U.S. vs. Microsoft case?

33. What is the typical trend of businesses today?

[A]To take in more foreign funds

[B]To invest more abroad

[C]To combine and become bigger

[D]To trade with more countries

34. According to the author, one of the driving forces behindM&A wave is _________。

[A]the greater customer demands

[B]a surplus supply for the market

[C]a growing proctivity

[D]the increase of the world's wealth

35. From paragraph 4 we can infer that _________。

[A]the increasing concentration is certain to hurt consumers

[B]WorldCom serves as a good example of both benefits and costs

[C]the costs of the globalization process are enormous

[D]the Standard Oil trust might have threatened competition

36. Toward the new business wave, the writer's attitude can be saidto be _________。

[A]optimistic

[B]objective

[C]pessimistic

[D]biased

>>>>>>答案解析<<<<<<

33. What is the typical trend of businesses today? 今天的商業典型的發展趨勢是什麼?

[A]To take in more foreign funds 吸收更多外資

[B]To invest more abroad 進行更多對外投資

[C]To combine and become bigger 合並做強

[D]To trade with more countries 與更多國家貿易

【答案】 C

【考點】 事實細節題。

【分析】 文章第一段中說“世界正在經歷一場前所未有的最大的的並購浪潮。這個浪潮從異常活躍的美國開始，橫掃歐洲，並以不可比擬的威力影響到正在崛起的國家”，因此可以判斷正確答案是[C]。

34. According to the author, one of the driving forces behindM&A wave is _______。

根據本文作者，在合並浪潮背後的一個驅動力是______。

[A]the greater customer demands 更大的消費需求

[B]a surplus supply for the market 對市場的剩餘供給

[C]a growing proctivity 日益增長的生產率

[D]the increase of the world’s wealth 世界財富的增長

【答案】 A

【考點】 事實細節題。

【分析】 根據“合並浪潮的推動力”可以定位到第三段。在作者看來，“日趨下降的運輸與通訊費用，較低的貿易與投資壁壘，以及市場的擴大和為滿足市場需求而進行的擴大生產，是推動這股巨大的並購浪潮的最主要的力量，也是推動全球化進程的力量”。將四個選項對比這三個因素，只有[A]包括了根據顧客的需要擴大市場這個因素。

35. From paragraph 4 we can infer that _____。

從第四段中我們可以推斷出_____。

[A] the increasing concentration is certain to hurt consumers

日益增長的集中肯定會損害消費者的利益

[B] WorldCom serves as a good example of both benefits and costs

世通就是一個合並利與弊的好例子

[C] the costs of the globalization process are enormous

全球化進程的成本很高

[D] the Standard Oil trust might have threatened competition

標准石油托拉斯或許已經威脅到競爭

【答案】 D

【考點】 推斷題。

【分析】 [A]“日益增長的集中肯定會損害消費者的利益”與原文第四段第一句不符合，因為作者說“這股合並浪潮是帶來益處還是弊端的實例還很少”，因此很難說肯定會帶來損害。[B]提到“世通”，說是一個帶來利益和降低成本的好例子。這句說是“價格沒有隨著合並而提高”，並沒有提到價格降低問題，因此，合並雖然沒有傷害消費者，也沒有給他們帶來利益。[C]本段沒有涉及。[D]可以從文中“很難想像當今的幾個石油公司的合並能夠再次造成像100年前美國標准石油托拉斯對競爭形成的威脅”，這說明當年這個石油公司肯定曾經對競爭造成巨大威脅。

36. Toward the new business wave, the writer’s attitudecan be said to be _____。

作者看待新的商業浪潮的態度可以說是_______。

[A]optimistic 樂觀的

[B]objective 客觀的

[C]pessimistic 悲觀的

[D]biased 歧視的

【答案】 B

【考點】 作者態度題。

【分析】 本題考查考生是否了解作者的態度。文中作者提到了“合並”的益處，但是同時也在第四段中提到“我們必須警惕這樣的合並浪潮”。作者是從兩個方面來談論這個問題的，因此我們可以判斷作者的態度應該是客觀的。

難句解析：

1. This phenomenon has created serious concerns over the role ofsmaller economic firms, of national businessmen and over the ultimate stabilityof the world economy。

【結構分析】本題的主幹是“This phenomenon has created serious concerns”，兩個“over”引導介賓短語，是並列的成分，做“concern”的定語。而“of smaller economic firms”與“of nationalbusinessmen”都是第一個“role”的定語。

2. I believe that the most important forces behind the massiveM&A wave are the same that underlie the globalization process: fallingtransportation and communication costs, lower trade and investment barriers andenlarged markets that require enlarged operations capable of meeting customers’ demands。

【結構分析】本句主句是“I believe ”，“that”引導一個賓語從句，在這個賓語從句中，後面的“that”前面省略了“forces”，這個“that”引導一個定語從句，修飾這個省略的“forces”。冒號後面的部分是“the most important forces”的同位語，其中“markets”後面的“that”引導定語從句修飾“markets”，“capable ofmeeting customers' demands”是“operations”的定語。

全文翻譯：

世界正在經歷一場前所未有的最大的的並購浪潮。這個浪潮從異常活躍的美國開始，橫掃歐洲，並以不可比擬的威力影響到正在崛起的國家。這些國家的許多人面對這個浪潮，倍感憂慮：“商業集中的浪潮會不會演變成一股無法控制的反競爭的力量?”

無疑，大企業正在變得更大、更強。1982年，跨國公司占國際貿易不到20%的份額。而如今，這個數字已經超過25%，並且還在迅速上升。在那些對外開放並鼓勵外資的經濟體中，國際分公司在生產中也正占據一個越來越大的份額。比如，在阿根廷，經過90年代初的改革之後，跨國公司在200家大型企業的工業生產中從43%增加到幾乎70%。這個現象使人們開始重視小型企業和民族資本的作用以及世界經濟的最終穩定。

我認為，日趨下降的運輸與通訊費用，較低的貿易與投資壁壘，以及市場的擴大和為滿足市場需求而進行的擴大生產，是推動這股巨大的並購浪潮的最主要的力量，也是推動全球化進程的力量。所有這些對消費者來說都是有益而無害的。隨著生產力的`提高，世界的財富也在增長。

這股合並浪潮是帶來益處還是弊端的實例還很少。但是很難想像當今的幾個石油公司的合並能夠再次造成像100年前美國標准石油托拉斯對競爭形成的威脅，人們當時很害怕這家公司，結果導致了它最終的解散。像世通這樣的通訊公司的合並似乎不會抬高消費價格，或者減緩技術進步的速度，與之相反的是通信的價格的快速下降。汽車行業的合並也同樣在增加——瞧瞧戴姆勒與克萊斯勒，雷諾與尼桑的合並——但看起來消費者並未受到傷害。

但是有一個事實，那就是合並必須受到密切關注。就在幾星期以前，格林斯潘對銀行業的大規模合並發出了警告。正在創建的這樣的巨大的銀行一旦出現，誰來充當最終的借貸者，誰來發揮監督、規范和運作的作用呢?當一個國家對破壞公平競爭的行為的處理過於嚴厲時，跨國公司會不會把它們的生產從一地轉到另一地呢?在那些將會影響許多其他國家的問題上，一個國家是否應該發揮“保護競爭”的作用，就如同美國政府對微軟公司案例那樣?

;

『陸』 考研英語真題1994-1999年的答案解析（不要只是閱讀的翻譯），如果還有1994年以前的就更好

發過去了哥們，希望對你有幫助，祝金榜題名～

『柒』 麻煩 誰有91年到99年考研英語真題閱讀部分的全文翻譯

91年到抄99年考研英語真題閱讀部分的全文翻譯這里有:

http://lm.cne.cn/ManageCheck.asp?adsid=512&UnionID=2820

『捌』 考研英語閱讀理解翻譯全文

考研英語閱讀是考研英語的關鍵,所以平時要多做並總結考研英語閱讀技巧。下面就是我給大家整理的考研英語閱讀理解翻譯全文，希望對你有用!
考研英語閱讀原文
Up until a few decades ago, our visions of the future were largely——though by no means uniformly——glowingly positive. Science and technology would cure all the ills of humanity, leading to lives of fulfillment and opportunity for all.

Now utopia has grown unfashionable, as we have gained a deeper appreciation of the range of threats facing us, from asteroid strike to epidemic flu and to climate change. You might even be tempted to assume that humanity has little future to look forward to.

But such gloominess is misplaced. The fossil record shows that many species have enred for millions of years —— so why shouldn't we? Take a broader look at our species' place in the universe, and it becomes clear that we have an excellent chance of surviving for tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of years. Look up Homo sapiens in the "Red List" of threatened species of the International Union for the Conversation of Nature (IUCN) ,and you will read: "Listed as Least Concern as the species is very widely distributed, adaptable, currently increasing, and there are no major threats resulting in an overall population decline."

So what does our deep future hold? A growing number of researchers and organizations are now thinking seriously about that question. For example, the Long Now Foundation has its flagship project a medical clock that is designed to still be marking time thousands of years hence.

Perhaps willfully, it may be easier to think about such lengthy timescales than about the more immediate future. The potential evolution of today's technology, and its social consequences, is dazzlingly complicated, and it's perhaps best left to science fiction writers and futurologists to explore the many possibilities we can envisage. That's one reason why we have launched Arc, a new publication dedicated to the near future.

But take a longer view and there is a surprising amount that we can say with considerable assurance. As so often, the past holds the key to the future: we have now identified enough of the long-term patterns shaping the history of the planet, and our species, to make evidence-based forecasts about the situations in which our descendants will find themselves.

This long perspective makes the pessimistic view of our prospects seem more likely to be a passing fad. To be sure, the future is not all rosy. But we are now knowledgeable enough to rece many of the risks that threatened the existence of earlier humans, and to improve the lot of those to come.
考研英語閱讀翻譯
幾十年前，我們對於未來的看法盡管並不一致，但總的來說頗為樂觀。我們相信科學和技術將會治癒人類的一切疾病，使所有人都過上充滿機會和成就感的生活。

如今，隨著我們對自己所面臨的一系列威脅有了更深刻的認識，比如從小行星撞擊，到流感，再到氣候變化，烏托邦式已經不合時宜。你甚至可能會禁不住要想：人類幾乎前途渺茫。

然而，這種擔憂不合時宜。化石記錄表明，許多物種已經存活了數百萬年之久，那麼人類為何就不可以呢?從一個更宏觀的視角來看一看人類在宇宙中的地位，就會清楚明白，即使人類生存不了幾十萬年，至少再存活幾萬年的機會還是很大。在國際自然保護聯盟的瀕危物種 "紅色名錄"上查閱"智人"這一條目，你會讀到："由於該物種分布非常廣泛，適應性強，目前數量持續上升，且不存在導致其整體數量下降的重大威脅，故被列為最無危物種"。

那麼，我們的遙遠未來會是什麼景象呢?越來越多的研究者和組織機構正在認真思考這個問題。比如，今日不朽基金會的旗艦項目是一台機械時鍾，該時鍾的設計目標是能夠在幾千幾萬年後保持計時功能。

這樣做或許有些一意孤行，但推想久遠的未來要比思考即將發生的未來更為容易。當今技術的可能發展及它的社會影響結果非常復雜，或許最好的辦法是讓科幻小說家和未來學家去探索我們能想像到的種種可能。這正是我們發行《弧》的原因之一，該新刊物旨在探索不遠的未來。

但是，如果採用一個更為長遠的視角，我們便能對驚人數量的事情做出很有把握的預測。通常，過去掌握著通向未來的鑰匙：目前，我們已經充分了解有關地球歷史和人類歷史的長期發展模式，這使我們能對子孫後代的生存環境做出有根據的預測。

這種長遠的視角使我們對未來的悲觀態度更像是一股短暫的風潮。誠然，未來絕非一片光明。不過，我們已經有足夠的知識去降低許多曾經威脅前人生存的危險，以及去改善後人的命運。
考研英語閱讀詞語解析
dedicated['dedi.keitid]adj. 專注的，獻身的，專用的

overall[əuvə'rɔ:l]adj. 全部的，全體的，一切在內的

strike[straik]n. 罷工，打擊，毆打 v. 打，撞，罷工，劃

adaptable[ə'dæptəbl]adj. 能適應的，適應性強的，可改編的

planet['plænit]n. 行星

immediate[i'mi:djət]adj. 立即的，即刻的，直接的，最接近的

pessimistic[.pesi'mistik]adj. 悲觀的，悲觀主義的

population[.pɔpju'leiʃən]n. 人口 ，(全體)居民，人數

opportunity[.ɔpə'tju:niti]n. 機會，時機

evolution[.i:və'lu:ʃən]n. 進化，發展，演變

猜你喜歡：

1. 考研英語閱讀美文雙語

2. 考研英語歷年閱讀真題及答案

3. 考研英語閱讀精華美文

4. 高中英語美文帶翻譯閱讀範文欣賞

5. 考研英語閱讀篇章的技巧

6. 簡單英語閱讀短文帶翻譯

『玖』 急求，考研英語1999閱讀全文翻譯~~~！感激！！

大約在網上交易的第一年當中，大部分業務活動都是圍繞著努力開發消費者市場來進行的。最近，隨著證明網路不僅是一種時尚而已，公司間便開始（在網上）交易產品和服務。這類公司之間的銷售是很有道理的，因為商人通常都知道他們需要什麼產品。

不過，由於懷疑網路的可靠性許多公司仍對網路的使用猶豫不決。Forrester研究所的資深分析家布蘭?歐文說，「商家需要認識到他們可以信賴銷售商和供應商之間的這種途徑。」有些公司為了限制這種冒險，只與那些已經熟識的貿易夥伴進行在線貿易，給予這些夥伴進入本公司區域網的權利。

網路商業模式的另一個重大變化體現在營銷策略上。前些年，互聯網上的營銷活動還集中在如何將用戶「拉進」網站的策略問題上。然而，在去年，軟體公司開發出新的技術，這些技術使得公司可以將信息直接「推出」給消費者，直接把營銷信息傳送給特定的用戶。最突出的例子是Pointcast網路，該網路使用一種屏幕保護系統，將大量最新的信息和廣告不斷地傳送到用戶的計算機顯示器上。用戶可以定製自己想要接受的信息，然後直接進入某個公司的網址。像Virtual Vineyards這樣的公司業已開始採用類似的技術將有關特價商品、產品推銷或其他活動的信息「推」向用戶。但這種「推」銷技術遭到許多網上用戶的鄙視。網上文化推崇這樣一個概念，即流動到屏幕上的信息應是在專門的請求之後才出現的。一旦商業促銷不請自來地充斥電腦屏幕，那麼網路和電視就沒多大差別了。這種前景讓網路凈化者感到不安。

網上公司並不是非得依靠「推銷」策略方能掙錢。像Virtual Vineyards和Amazon.com及其他開拓者的例子說明：一個銷售適類商品的網站，如果將交互性、熱情服務、安全性合理結合，肯定會吸引網上用戶的。計算能力的成本持續自由下降，這對任何建立了網上銷售的企業來說都是個好的徵兆。回顧過去的5到10年的歷史，人們很可能會感到奇怪：嘗試網上銷售的公司為何如此之少呢？

還有解析呢？要不