李華去閱讀俱樂部作文英語

① 假定你是李華,校英文報某專欄本周討論的主題為「閱讀」英語作文

英語作文：
Reading is very important in our study. The more you read, the more knowledge you command.
At the same time, we learn how to use these knowledge in our life. It is important for our growing up too.
So I have my own reading plan: read books at least one hour every day.

② 英語話題作文,假如你是李華要申請加入英語俱樂部的英語角的組織者的申請信

Dear Sir/Madam,
My name is L/ Hua. I've learned that an organizer for the English Corner is wanted by
the English Club. I'm writing to apply for the position.
I am good at spoken English. I took part in the English Speech Contest last year and won
first prize. Besides, I am outgoing and energetic, so it is easy for me to make new friends. I
believe I am the right person for the position.
If I'm chosen, I'll offer my best service. I'll choose some interesting topics for the
members to talk about freely. In addition, we can learn to sing English songs, perform English
plays and hold some debates regularly.
Looking forward to your early reply.
Yours,
Li Hua

③ 閱讀俱樂部的英文作文

Ladies and Gentlemen, First of all, please allow me to express the most heartfelt welcome to all of you on behalf of our English Club. We have been looking forward to seeing you for long. It is a wonderful day today. I would like to brief my club to you since I want to leave the most wonderful for you to discover. Our club, organizing various activities regularly catering for the needs of participants, is well-known among many English learners. If you want to meet native English speakers, please join us. If you want to speak English not only accurately but also fluently, please join us. If you want to discover the most attractive aspects in English, please join us. I do hope that you will enjoy your journey of English study with us. Thank you! Sincerely Yours

④ 寫一篇關於參加閱讀俱樂部的英語作文。

Even some ardent conservationists acknowledge that the diversity of life on Earth cannot be fully sustained as human populations expand? use more resources? nudge the climate and move weedlike pests and predators from place to place.

Given that some losses are inevitable? the debate among many experts has shifted to an uncomfortable subject? what level of loss is acceptable. The discussion is taking place at both the local and global levels? How small can a fragment of an ecosystem be and still function in all its richness? and thus be considered preserved？ And as global biodiversity diminishes? is it a valid fallback strategy to bank organisms and genes in zoos? DNA banks or the like? or does this simply justify more habitat destruction？ Is nature on ice a sufficient substitute for the real thing？ Some conservation groups have strenuously avoided or even attacked such calculations and strategies. They say there is no safe diminution of habitat as long as human understanding of ecology is as sketchy as it is? a fallback strategy is unthinkable. Furthermore? banking nature in a deep freeze or database of gene sequences cannot capture context. For instance? even if a vanished bird was someday reconstituted from its genes? would it warble with the same fluency as its ancestors？ On the other side of the debate? those considering what the smallest viable habitats are or how to expand archives as an insurance policy say that recen t trends have proved that old conservation strategies are no longer sufficient. A few decades ago? the issue seemed fairly uncomplicated? identify biological 「hot spots」 or species of concern and establish as many reserves as possible. But the picture has grown murky.

Twenty?four years ago? Dr. Thomas E. Lovejoy and other biologists began a remarkable experiment on the fast?eroding fringe of rain forest near the Brazilian city of Manaus. They established 11 forest tracts? ranging from 2.5 to 250 acres? each surrounded by an isolating sea of pasture similar to what is advancing around most other tropical forests. Among the many findings? an analysis published last week on birds in the lower layers of greenery found that it would take a fragment measuring at least 2?500 acres—10 times as large as the biggest one in the experiment—to prevent a decline of 50 percent in those bird varieties in just 15 years or so.

In the understated language of science? the new study? in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences? concludes?